The way that federal legislation since the 1980s reflected American concerns about potential negative effects of international migration was: <span> it has increased requirements for migrants seeking citizenship
The abundance amount of migrants will increase the total welfare expense that the country has to spend and will pretty much shrink the potential jobs available for our own citizen. As a response for that, we regulate the citizenship process and only allowed the migrants that would increase our economic capabilities.
</span>
Answer:
Freedom and equality.
Explanation:
The Congress during the 1990's enacted "The Civil Rights Act" on July 2, 1964 which prohibited private bisinesses unequal application of discrimination and racial segregation in employment, public services, and public accomodations, on the bases of physical and mental disabilities, which clashes between the freedom and equality of the citizens.
The Act further prohibits unequal application of Voter registration requirements, and racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accomodations and also on bases of mental and physical disabilities.
This discriminatory act by private businesses construed upon the freedom and equality of the citizens to be given free and fair chances in business to gain employment, to benefit from public services, and public accommodations, and the Congress feels that its duty is to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the law and protect their voting rights irrespective of any disabilities they might have.
Companies sell stock so they can raise capital.
So the company can afford new equipment, developing new markets, etc..
I believe it is B—California was admitted as a free state.
