The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
In an economic system with monopolies and cartels that fix the price of goods, the end result for consumers is that consumers are given worse choices and pay a higher price. This is a result of the lack of competition in the market that would drive prices down and offer more choices to consumers.
Answer:
B. Trial, appellate, and high courts.
Explanation:
The federal court is court system that is usually in charge of lawsuit between either two states in a country, a country and citizens, a country and other countries etc. While the state court system have an authority to decide on cases between citizens in a state, a state and its citizens, etc.
Both courts operate on the same set of laws that has been established in cognizance of with the country's constitution. Therefore the verdict by either system is based on justification and purity. A major similarity between the two systems is trial, appellate, and high courts.
Answer:
you should try this I Not a confusing question
