1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kenny6666 [7]
3 years ago
11

PLSSS HELP ME I WILL MARK U!!!!!!!

Mathematics
2 answers:
babymother [125]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Everything except 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Terms are separated by signs. 2 is the coefficient (number in front of a variable)

katovenus [111]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: am not 100% sure but shouldn't it be all if them?

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
The sum of two numbers is 57 The larger number is 15 more than the smaller number. What are the numbers?
mixas84 [53]
X+y=57
y=x+15
x+x+15=57
2x=42
x=21
y=21+15
y=36
5 0
3 years ago
How do I find the y value for point I such that DI and EI form a 3:5 ratio.
liraira [26]
3:5 ratio mean there are 8 "parts" (3 + 5 = 8)

The distance between the x-coordinates is |-3 - 5| = 8.
So each "part" is 8/8 = 1 unit long in the x-direction. 
You want I to be 3(1) = 3 units from D, so the x-coordinate of I is -3 + 3 = 0.

Same deal for y.
|2 - 5| = 3 is the distance between D and E
Each part is 3/8.
3(3/8) = 9/8
2 + 9/8 = 25/8

So the point I is (0, 25/8)


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Provide an Example of how to draw transformed figures that are translated, reflected, and rotated.
solniwko [45]

Step-by-step explanation:

Translations: When a figure is slid to another place on the coordinate grid (for example if i asked you to move the figure 2 units down and 4 units to the left)

Reflected: When a figure is reflected across the y-axis or the x-axis and both figures are congruent to each other.

Rotated: When a figure is rotated (for example if i asked you to rotate the figure 90 degrees)

7 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A more complex question has rarely been asked.

Principia Mathematica took nearly a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. It does meander a bit, but had they wanted to prove 1+1=2 alone, it could have done so in 500 pages.

Mathematically speaking, the definition of 1 is:

There exists a number such that when multiplied upon an element of a specified set, yields the element of the specified set.

It is also defined as:

1.0000000000000000000000…

.9999999999999999999999999…

as the set of all singletons.

a singleton is a set with exactly 1 element.

These 4 definitions work in tandem with one another.

For example:

1=1

Divide both sides by 3.

1/3=1/3

Rewrite.

1/3=.33333333333333333...

Multiply both sides by 3.

1=.9999999999999999999...

Similarly:

If    =.9999999999999999999...

10=9.99999999999999999...

10=9+.99999999999999...

10=9+

Simplify by subtracting x from both sides.

9=9

=1

.99999999999999999999...=1

As the set of all singletons, 1 is also THE element that represents the set of all single entities.

That is to say: if you have 7 erasers. What you really have is a set of 7 single entities. The definition of 7 becomes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; and not as is commonly believed as: 6 + 1.

There is an argument for 7 to be defined as 6 + 1, but this argument is a corollary of the Peano Axioms which in turn argues that there exists a set with absolutely nothing in it {} and a set with exactly something in it {x}. More on this later.

The Principia Mathematica uses Peano's (from the Peano Axioms mentioned earlier) work and notation to expertly slice through the many nuances pertaining to this question.

This is something we will not do; but hopefully, we will also be able to effectively demonstrate why 1 + 1 = 2 in less than 1000 pages.

We will assume these basic principles of number theory:

There exists a number such that when multiplied to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

There exists a number such that when added to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

If we again assume to have only two sets, a set that is empty: {} containing no elements, and a set that is not empty {x} containing an element. We realize that Consequently, we went from nothing {}, to something {x}. This means that {x} is the successor to {}, as the next step up from nothing, is something.

As such we now have two elements:

Nothing, {}, and something that comes after {}, this something is called the successor, and it is the Successor of nothing.

in written notation we have:

{} and { the Successor of nothing }

Rewritten:

{0, the thing that comes after 0}

Further reworded:

{0, Successor (0) }

Reduced further:

0,(0)

Where S(0) stands in place of ‘the successor’. Further, we know there are an infinite number of possible Natural numbers, and we get:

{0, Successor of 0, the successor of the successor of 0, the successor of the successor of the successor of 0,…}

Further reduced:

0,(0),((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

Further explained:

We know that we had nothing, and added something to it, and got something:

Nothing + Something = Successor of nothing.

0+__=(0)

We also know that there is nothing closer to 0, than the thing that comes after 0.

0+(0)=(0)

This implies that S(0) is the smallest increment possible from natural number to next natural number.

As a consequence, we now have two discovered entities: Something, and Nothing.

Let’s give them names.

We have decided that

Nothing = 0 .

0 = Nothing.

S(0) is the something that comes after nothing.

We define a new symbol: 1, to be: 1 = S(0)

This is to say that 1 IS the symbol that succeeds 0;

We could have drawn any shape to define the number that succeeds 0; we chose to draw a 1.

0+(0)=(0)

0+1=(0)

0+1=1

0,1,((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

We now have definitions for 0, and 1. What about a definition for the thing that comes after one? The successor of 1?

As we know S(0) is the smallest increment available, and we are interested in finding S(0)’s successor we investigate:

The successor to the successor of Nothing:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)

This reads:

The successor of the successor of nothing IS the successor of one

And now… we need a new symbol.

We define the

(1)=2

The successor of 1 IS 2.

Thus:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)=2

Simplify:

0+1=1;1+1=(1);(1)=2.

Further:

0+1=1;1+1=2;2=2.

1 has many different properties; but all of the properties and their resulting definitions have little to do with why 1 + 1 = 2. And that 1 + 1 = 2 is a byproduct of properties inherent to Natural numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
6x + 10 = - 2y<br> y=mx+b
liraira [26]

Answer:

y = -3x - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

-2y = 6x + 10

divide both sides by -2

y = -3x - 5

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which tribe uses irrigation, so that they can grow crops and maintain their sedentary lifestyle? Apache Caddo Karankawa Jumano
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me
    11·1 answer
  • John and Tim are looking at the equation the square root of the quantity of 3 times x minus 4 equals square root of x . John say
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is correct about ?
    8·2 answers
  • I need to find the area <br><br>plz explain your answer
    6·1 answer
  • Our buyer client Heather just signed a purchase agreement for a $520,000 home. The LTVR is 60%. How much is Heather putting down
    7·1 answer
  • If anyone could help NOW I would appreciate it
    7·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Compare%20%5C%3A%20the%20%5C%3A%20graphs%20%5C%3A%20of%20%5C%5C%203x%20-%204y%20%3D%208%20%5C%
    5·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to (4 x cubed) (2 x) superscript negative 4?
    14·1 answer
  • Sravya earns $42,820 per year in take home pay. What is the most money a housing expert would advise her to spend on a monthly m
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!