Answer:
B. Nonwhite South Africans were forced to live in segregate areas
Explanation:
The apartheid in South Africa was terrible toward the nonwhite population. The nonwhite population was segregated and discriminated against at every possible level. Everything in the country was controlled by the white minority, while the nonwhite population was left on the margins. The nonwhite population was not allowed to even live in the same areas as the white population, but instead it was forced to live in other areas. The job opportunities were very limited, the education and institutions not available to them, and all in all they were put to live in miserable conditions without any opportunities in life.
Answer:
its not plagiarizing
Explanation:
its just helping out people who are stuck and need help
Answer: Medieval doctors did not have a clue what caused disease. Most doctors still believed the Greek theory from Galen, a doctor during the Roman Empire, that you became ill when the 'Four Humours' - phlegm, black bile, yellow bile, blood - became unbalanced.
It took a country that was already in economic shambles (Germany), and forced them to pay heavy reparations, which would eventually lead to Hitlers rise of power.
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>
