Answer:
conflicts where the United States and the Soviet Union had competing interests
Explanation:
The Cold War period is a period of very tense relations between the two global superpowers, the USA and the USSR. Both countries were trying to impose their dominance as much as possible all around the world, with both of them having their allies and supporters, and opposition and enemies. Despite the constant threats to one another, these two countries never had a direct war between each other, but instead the battlefields were on neutral terrain, where they both had interests. Some examples of such conflicts are the ones in Vietnam, the Korean Peninsula, and Afghanistan.
Answer:
It’s C trust me scouts honor.
Explanation:
Apex
<span>The actions of the Union general’s Grant and Sherman did
have a direct effect on the outcome of the civil war. During this civil war
general Grant was considered the best soldier and he did prove his name right
by capturing both the Fort Donelson and Vicksburg. On the other hand General
Sherman marched through Georgia and Carolinas and this resulted in weakening
the enemies logistically and psychologically. This team is considered the main reason behind
the Union’s winning of the civil war. </span>
Answer:
The term feudal is a tricky one, because few scholars can quite agree on what it means ... Medieval economies were largely based around the operations of those ... with a combination of free and unfree labor—let's talk about how that came to be. ... The land of these manors was tilled by unfree agricultural workers, or serfs.
Explanation:
The decision of Baker v. Carr was one of the most wrenching in the Court's history. The case had to be put over for reargument because in conference no clear majority emerged for either side of the case. Associate Justice Charles Evans Whittaker was so torn over the case that he eventually had to recuse himself for health reasons. The arduous decisional process in Baker is often blamed for Whittaker's subsequent health problems, which forced him to retire from the Court in 1962.
The opinion was finally handed down in March 1962, nearly a year after it was initially argued. The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker's case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions. Brennan reformulated the political question doctrine, identifying six factors to help in determining which questions were "political" in nature.
