1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Archy [21]
2 years ago
11

Review the passage and answer the 2-point Constructed Response (literary analysis) question that follows:

English
1 answer:
blagie [28]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes the author does

Explanation:

You should not let a teen drive just because there freinds drive bad or had problems. If your kid is responsible then he or she should be able to drive.

You might be interested in
English
Levart [38]

Answer:

It is preferable to study English in an English speaking country

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the central idea.
nirvana33 [79]

Answer:B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following passages is an example of the omniscient narrator?
quester [9]

The correct answer is B. “For an hour the old man had been seeing black spots before his eyes and the sweat salted his eyes and salted the cut over his eye and on his forehead.”

Explanation:

An omniscient narrator also known as god-like narrator is a type of narrator that tells the events from a third person perspective that is mainly objective and has unlimited access to the characters' perspectives, thoughts, feelings, and inner processes and hidden events, this implies omniscient narrator use third-person pronouns such as "he" or "she" and has access to all the events in a story. In the passage, “For an hour the old man had been seeing black spots before his eyes and the sweat salted his eyes and salted the cut over his eye and on his forehead.”, what is being described is a personal experience, in this case, an old man seems to be in a dream or hallucination state. As this is only experienced by the old man, the only way for the narrator to know this information is to be an omniscient narrator as this is the only type of narrator that can have access to this type of personal  experiences from other characters, additionally the narrator uses third person references such as "the old man" and "his eyes" which implies it has a third-person view which supports the idea of an omniscient narrator as it is objective and has access to the personal experiences of the character.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jorge is factoring a quadratic expression. First he factors out the greatest common factor & then uses grouping.
arlik [135]

Answer:

B. 6x^2 − 9x − 27

Explanation:

Here is the complete question :

Jorge is factoring a quadratic expression. First, he factors out the greatest common factor, and then he uses grouping. Which expression could be jorges expression?

A. 7x2 − 28

B. 6x2 − 9x − 27

C. 4x2 + 18x + 8

D. 24x2 + 2x

A quadratic equation is an equation that usually has a single variable and it is raised to the power of 2.

it is usually in the form : ax² + bx + c = 0

a, b,c are known numbers

x is unknown

looking through the options, it is only option b that satisfies the two steps Jorge carries out

1. he factors out the greatest common factor

6x2 − 9x − 27

this factor is 3. the equation then becomes 2x2 - 3x - 9

2, he uses grouping.

to group, determine the factors of 2x^2 x -9  = -18x^2 that adds up to -3x : they are -6x and +3x

grouping them now becomes : (6x^2 + 3x) (-6x -27)

7 0
2 years ago
Read the following excerpt from Nixon's "Checker's" speech: Which logical fallacy or fallacies would you say he used and why? Ex
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

What is he actually saying? Is he saying that he took 18000 dollars and that is not only legally or morally wrong? Is he saying that he took 18000 dollars and that it was secretly given and secretly handled and that in return, he granted special favors to the people who gave him the money? Is he actually admitted doing that?

From this part of the speech, we don't know. Nixon was so slimy that you need the rest of the speech to know what he did and what he's admitting to. But what he is saying is that if he could buy a new GM product with the money and not declare what he had done, then he was wrong both morally and legally.

So what's wrong? The problem is if his next statement is that it was for expenses occurred and he can flap a receipt in the face of his accusers, he has shown them to be rats and much worse than he is.

And if he actually did take the 18000 for personal reasons, then he is on his way to getting the sympathy he needs to beat the charge. And the Democrats loose even if they are right. He shows himself to be a decent honorable man no matter which answer is true.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does dialogue in a story affect the pace?
    7·1 answer
  • The authorial voice is best defined as __________.
    15·2 answers
  • How many different kinds of blindness are
    5·1 answer
  • Which answer is the correct pronoun and BEST identifies its function in the sentence?
    12·2 answers
  • This an example of dramatic irony because
    7·1 answer
  • Read the excerpts from Ovid’s Pyramus and Thisbe and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.
    5·1 answer
  • For the items 7-8, which of the following pairs don't belong,
    14·1 answer
  • _______ to boys going along a road _________ saw a nut _______ the ground _______ ran quickly to pick it up picked ________ othe
    10·1 answer
  • 20 points and brainliest? Read the poem "Still I rise" by Maya Angelou, what is your interpretation of this poem, highlight any
    7·1 answer
  • In The Odyssey - Teiresias, when Teiresias describes the conflicts that Odysseus will face, how do these conflicts relate to the
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!