I believe that this situation represents the concept of challenge in the cognitive appraisal process.
Cognitive appraisal a theory of emotion that involves personal interpretations of people in an event to determine their emotional reaction. The most important part of this theory is the way we interpret the event (as a positive or negative occurrence), as well as what we believe caused the situation. Challenge is experienced when there is an opportunity for self-growth with available coping strategies, whereas threat is experienced when the situation is perceived as leading to failure with no available strategies to cope with it. We hypothesized that participants who appraised the situation as a challenge would perform better and adapt better to changes under difficult goal conditions, as compared with general goals or strategy goals.
Answer:
A. A strong federal government would provide stability to the nation.
Explanation:
John Adams was a Federalist who believed that there should be a strong federal government to control the nation. As at the time when he contested for the position of the Presidency in 1796, he was a Federalist. The Federalists were opposed to the Democratic-Republicans who believed in the strict interpretation of the constitution as well as the rights of the states to make decisions for their citizens.
Thomas Jefferson who contested alongside John Adams formed belonged to the Democratic-Republican party. These two parties were not formed as at the time when George Washington contested for the presidency.
Answer:
C)
Explanation:
It says it'll secure economic opportunities.
Breach of the duty of care term is used to describe the failure to act as a reasonable person would act.
The “reasonable character” is a hypothetical character who tactics any situation with a precise amount of caution and then sensibly takes movement. it's miles a general created to provide courts and juries with an objective test that may be utilized in finding out whether or not a person's movements constitute negligence
A reasonable character with a reasonable regular diploma of cause, prudence, care, foresight, or intelligence whose behavior, end, or expectation in relation to a particular condition or truth is used as a goal general by which to measure or decide something (because of the life of negligence) we've got usually ...
A reasonable person is a hypothetical person used as a felony widespread to decide whether the conduct of the parties in a case becomes right in the instances. it's far the same old behavior followed by means of people of ordinary intelligence and prudence.
Learn more about reasonable here;
brainly.com/question/16025911
#SPJ4
<span>Promise of a country's constitution is different from reality. The constitution often is molded by politically affluent people and thus the promise of a nation constitution may differ from reality. For eg if constitution allowed for right to speech, still people are not allowed to express their opinions freely.</span>