Answer: Experimenter bias.
Explanation: Experimenter bias is the condition which describes a person as a part of experiment who is influencing the outcome of the experiment so that the desired or preferred results can be obtained.Experimenter bias is also known as research biasing.
The example mentioned in the question where Brian is conducting the study with sharing his views with the participants that he expects girls should perform better than boys in the experiment is example of experimenter bias.
The actual experiment should have been conducted without any thought sharing or acknowledgement which would have produced unbiased outcomes.But according to Brain's study, the expectations are conveyed ,therefore it will influence the result of the experiment as it becomes biased.
The interactionist perspective is the sociological perspective that would most likely be concerned with the stigmatizing nature of formal social controls that require convicted offenders to register with police agencies and have their pictures published in newspapers to make their identities publicly known.
An approach to sociology known as the interactionist perspective emphasizes the regular interactions people have with one another as the cornerstone of how societies form. Instead of concentrating solely on the function of society, interactionism emphasizes the role of people as social actors.
An interactionist approach places a lot of emphasis on social interactions, or how individuals interact with one another.
The emphasis on interpersonal interactions, the use of symbols in communication and interaction, interpretation as a component of action, and the construction of the self by individuals and others in adaptable, flexible social processes through communication are some traits of the symbolic interactionist perspective.
To learn more about the Interactionist Perspective refer to:
brainly.com/question/16270837
#SPJ1
Answer:
This statement is FALSE
Explanation:
Civil law is based on certain laws that are organized in codes. When law courts interpret civil law, they consider these specific codes. They do not use tradition, precedent and custom. This is why a civil law system is less flexible, since the judges rely upon the details of the codes and the do not interpret further than that.
This research would take into account organizational and interpersonal contexts.
<h3>How are these contexts associated with the research?</h3>
- The organizational context would take into account how the workplace influences the relationship.
- This context would also highlight the role of the organization and the way it is impacted by the relationship.
- The interpersonal context would analyze how people interact with each other within the work environment.
- This context would analyze how much this interaction influences the emergence of the relationship.
Studies that analyze romantic relationships will always take into account the interpersonal context, as it needs to know the interaction between people and the evolution of this interaction at a personal level.
When this study also considers the workplace, it is also necessary to analyze the organizational context, as the work environment is a formal organization with little room for relationships.
Learn more about interpersonal contexts:
brainly.com/question/15461157
#SPJ1
Abstract
The distribution of wealth in the world is manifested by the polarization of a rich North and a poor South. Is the North-South conflict increasing or decreasing, and does it depend on such variables as major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and world prosperity, as some schools of thought maintain? Focusing on these questions from a leadership-long cycle perspective suggests several hypotheses about the interrelationships between global economic growth, Northern antagonism, and North-South conflict. The effect of conflict on growth is also examined. Generating data on world economic growth and major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and North-South conflict for the period from 1870 to 1992, vector auto-regression analysis is used to test new hypotheses. Results provide considerable support for the new hypotheses, provide mixed support for the previous arguments, and show that the relationship between world economic growth and conflict is not the same before and after World War II.
