To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
Reason, research, resonance, redescription, rewards, real-world events, and resistance. Hope this helped! :D
What is the passage?
lol, Parentheses are generally used as an explanation or afterthought into a passage that is grammatically already complete without the stuff in the parentheses. In writing it is u usually marked with curved brackets.
Example: He finally answered (after taking five minutes to think) that he did not understand the question.
I hope that this helps....
Answer:
D)The Princess Cocachin was a great friend of Marco Polo, and she urged her father to allow him to go with the party.
Explanation:
This is the option that shows the best way to rewrite this sentence correctly. This sentence conveys two main ideas: 1) that the princess is a great friend of Marco Polo and 2) that the princess urged her father to allow Marco Polo to go with the party. The best way to join these two complete sentences is by using a comma and the word "and."
During he Pilgrim's Progress, both Christian and his companion are
detained as they pass through Vanity Fair, because of their open disdain about the contents of the area.
