I think yes because Dell Laurel-Leaf, an imprint of Random House Children's Books. After one of his football games, Crash comes home to find his grandfather, Scooter. Penn and his parents are protesting the mall and making shirts to promote their cause. Penn, not realizing he's walking into an argument, says hi to Crash and Jane.
hope this helps have a great day :)
Answer:
All of the options represent qualities of an omniscient narrator.
Explanation:
Omniscient is a literary technique of writing a narrative in third person, in which the narrator knows the feelings and thoughts of every character in the story.
An omniscient narrator can tell or show the reader what each character thinks and feels in a scene, freely, because she/he/it is not one of them.
Sentence 6: Some people believe that the government does not have the right to force people to be safe, and that these laws are unfair.
The counterargument in an essay is the argument that a person would make against the essay's overall claim. In this essay, the author is arguing for consistent seat belt laws across all states for both drivers and passengers. The author wants the government to get involved because seat belts save lives. The counterargument contradicts the author in that it argues that the government should not be the one deciding whether or not a person should be wearing a seat belt. Laws for seat belts are unfair as they infringe upon a person's rights.
Did you mean to attach a picture of the answers or you don’t have the multiple answer choices?
D) Thought Police, From what i looked up everything was about the Thought Police
