Answer:
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "secondary source," since this would be analyzing something in the past.
The crusades led to the increase in trade and seeking of new trade routes for Europe.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The influence and the effect of the crusade on Europe was both negative also and it was positive also. The positive impact of the crusades was that it led to the increase of the trade and led to the growth and development in Europe with the expansion of their market.
The negative impact of the crusades on Europe was the religious polarization in the area of Europe.
This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
