Answer:
The principle of the rule of law
Explanation:
Not only self-rule, but representative government had taken root on American soil. The English Magna Carta, written more than 400 years before the Mayflower Compact, established the principle of the rule of law.
B because they thought the treaty was unfit for the Germans and what they did
I can't see what Option 1 is, but if I had to choose from the other three options I would say <u>Option 3: made laws based on scripture and tried lawbreakers in courts.</u>
Also, I can only see one answer for the next question (No. 19), but the main purpose of the Crusades was to unify Europe and retake the Holy Land (Jerusalem) from the Muslims. This was enacted after hundreds of years of Muslim attacks on Southern Europe (i.e Spain, Italy, etc.), they actually succeeded in Spain, and made force conversions of Christians to Islam when they took Rome. I took a trip to Spain last year and it was interesting to see the history of the conquests, there was an old prison that had crosses carved into the wood on the sides from Christians trying to pray before they were executed.
New markets for goods, new lands for natural resources. As in the case of all imperial colonies (including us when we were a British colony!), having new land has broad economic opportunities. Not only can the new land provide different resources and raw materials with which the mother country can make luxury manufactured goods, but a new colony is...
Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.
