According to historical records, the populist movement was considered a reaction to the second industrial revolution because it tackled the sociopolitical and economic challenges of that era.
The second industrial revolution was characterized by:
- railroad construction and ownership by privates,
- mass production of different products, particularly iron and steel,
- electrical energy generation, amongst others.
The populist movement reacted to these new challenges and opportunities because many of the second industrial revolutions were initiated by private individuals whose motives were to earn profits through their investments.
The drive for profits in the second industrial revolution leads to the rise of capitalism in which the populist movement is against.
For instance, populist movement demands include:
- eight working hours per day,
- graduated income tax,
- government ownership of railroads and telephones, etc.
All the demands above were raised as a result of the second industrial revolution.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the populist movement was a reaction to the second industrial revolution in many ways.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21969641
<em><u>Lack of sanitation,</u></em><em> </em><em><u>ineffective treatments</u></em>, and <em><u>increase of rats and fleas</u></em> are the contributors. The other three are the effects.
Davis <span>spoke at the Alabama capitol in Montgomery </span>on February 18, 1861, about the virtues of the new constitution, which he claimed was in tune with the 1787 Constitution written in Philadelphia and was also in accord with the Declaration of Independence.
He argued that the Confederate states had no choice but to form their own constitution after the actions of the federal government.
This is on the grounds that inhabitants intermediaries and real estate agents managed in contracts and home loans the banned the offer of the nonwhite home. In the 1950s, the suburbs have noticeably increased to 47% and more people have become the owner of a small territory.
Answer:
What were the primary methods that the U.S. Government, as well as individual reformers, used to deal with the perceived Indian threat to westward settlement?
The first strategy that was used by settlers to perceive Indians was to negotiate and move tribes out of their way. The First Treaty of Fort Laramie was “signed”, it established tribal borders in return for 50 thousand dollars annual payments for 50 years. Settlers also promised not to interfere in Indians lives.
In what ways were these methods successful and unsuccessful? What were their short-term and long-term effects on Native Americans?
The short-term effect was that The First Treaty of Fort Laramie was broken because of government corruption, the payments that were agreed never reached the tribes and some reservations were not respected. Settlers went forward forced Indian tribes out of their land.
The long term effect was that Native American tribes were pushed and pushed “out of the way” until they were completely destroyed and killed sometimes.
For the settlers, those methods were successful because they did not fulfill their agreements which permitted them to get more land and have more money.
