Answer:
A) They both had the Free Exercise Clause, or the First Amendment.
B) Wisconsin v. Yoder was about kids not finishing school while Employment Division v. Smith was about doing illegal drugs in the workplace. That is why they had different holdings even though they were both for a religious purpose.
C) A member of the public that is upset about the holding in Employment Division v. Smith could have people sign petitions to pass a new law that would overturn the holding made by the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
<span>Civilizations wanted to settle and build cities and/or outposts along trading routes for so it would be easy to acquire what they didn't have, and sell what they did, and gain economic prosperity. These became the most desirable and wealthy spots, and thus were fought over in wars.</span>
