This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
Answer:
The answer is (B) transfer dollars, and therefore purchasing power, into the future.
Explanation:
A store of value is best described as a function contained in an asset that allows it to be saved, retrieved, and traded in the future. Money provides this function, alongside other forms of assets such as bonds, gemstones, and precious metals. Other functions of money, include as a medium of exchange and a unit of account.
Answer:
D hope that helps you out
The Chester company is likely implementing a strategy called
the niche differentiation. This is the process in which helps a specific
organization or company to coexist by having to use their environment in a
different way in when they are to compete.
Answer:
Firms may be inclined to keep their workers’ wages above the equilibrium level.
Explanation:
The efficiency wage theory states that if an employer increases the wage of his/her employees, they will be motivated and their productivity will increase. The increase in productivity should offset the increased labor costs. So the costs of higher wages should be recouped through increased productivity. Higher wages also reduce worker turnover, reducing hiring and training costs.
