Greater need for weaponry/tools
so then factories started creating jobs and so people gained more jobs and more people started to save up their money because commercial items weren't really being made bc war!!
and it also really unified the nation as a whole.
<u>The events related to Oklahoma statehood in chronological order as follows:</u>
- Native Americans petition for statehood
- The Organic Act is passed
- Congress passes the Enabling Act
- Oklahoma becomes a US state
Answer: Option C, D, A, and B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In 1890, Oklahoma Organic Law organized the West of India and a strip of land called No Man's Land on the Oklahoma Territory. Later that year, in 1891 and 1893, reserves were set up in the New Territory for landing sites. The delegation was well received in Washington.
Eastern politicians fear that two more Western powers will come and put pressure on US President. Roosevelt advised India and Oklahoma to give statehood together. This prompted the convention which approved the Oklahoma Enabling Act to allow it in writing and ratify the constitution.
In 1902, representatives of five tribes met and decided to work for statehood of Oklahoma. In that meeting they drew the map for the state and decided who will be the representative who will appeal for statehood of Oklahoma in the Congress of the United States of America.
The then President of the United States of America Theodore Roosevelt passed the enabling act which recognized Oklahoma as a state in 1907 and the people of Oklahoma adopted the national constitution.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the argument having to do with the fact that capitalism is the driving force of wealth--since without these leaders capitalism would cease to thrive. </span></span>
<span>Roman military personal equipment</span> was produced in large numbers to established patterns, and it was used in an established way. These standard patterns and uses were called the res militaris or disciplina. Its regular practice during the Roman Republic and Roman Empire led to military excellence and victory. Roman equipment (especially armor) gave them "a very distinct advantage over their barbarian enemies." [1]This did not imply that every Roman soldier had better equipment than the richer men among his opponents. According to Edward Luttwak, Roman equipment was not of a better quality than that used by the majority of its adversaries.[2]
Initially, they used weapons based on Greek and Etruscan models. On encountering the Celts, they based new varieties on Celtic equipment. To defeat the Carthaginians, they constructed an entire fleet de novo based on the Carthaginian model. Once a weapon was adopted, it became standard. The standard weapons varied somewhat during Rome's long history, but the equipment and its use were never individual.
The legionary wore his sword high on the right side of his body. This enabled it to be drawn underarm with his right hand without interfering with the shield<span> which he carried in his left.</span>
A soldier carried two spears to throw at the enemy. The spears were just over two metres* long and they were designed to bend and stick in the enemy's shield so he cannot use it to protect himself. They were difficult to pull out and will bend on impact, so they couldn't be thrown back at the attacking Roman soldiers.
<span>The pugio was a small dagger used by Roman soldiers as a sidearm. It was worn on left side.</span>
<span>
</span>
Your answer is A,B, and C love!
