In the play Julius Caesar, why was Brutus’ downfall not his own doing?

English

1 answer:

Soloha48 [4]3 years ago

7 0

Brutus was responsible for his own downfall because he was naïve and did not listen to advice.

The main reason that Brutus was responsible for his own downfall was that he did not listen to Cassius. He never took anyone else’s advice on issues such as how best to assassinate Caesar or how to run the military campaign against Antony and Octavius. Instead, he wanted to remain optimistic. Since he did not, they failed. He was naïve, and he paid the price.

You might be interested in

Write a text:

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Of course yes

Explanation:

Many children and minors in general watch Tv netflix etc. Those scenes could have a tremendous impact on them. Cutting off such scenes is higly advisable not only for their safety but also for their psychological well-being.

3 0

3 years ago

All of the ancient civilizations developed in Mesopotamia except the

Sedaia [141]

Answer:

Egyptians

Explanation:

They are the only ones NOT from Mesopotamia

6 0

3 years ago

Comparing and contrasting Wilson’s economic and social reforms.

7nadin3 [17]

Federal Reserve Act

<span>Established Federal Trade Commisssion </span>

<span>1916 - Passed child labor law</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Think about how Alec's monologue contributes to the meaning of the play. What details in this speech help you better understand

trapecia [35]

Hello. You did not inform the play to which this question refers, which makes it impossible to formulate an exact answer. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.

A monologue is a character's speech. This speech the character makes alone because he is expressing his deepest feelings and thoughts. This promotes a broad understanding of the audience with the character's actions, because the character is showing the most intimate of his being. Usually these speeches are emotional and have a strong appeal to the feelings of the audience, the actor and the character.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What does the metaphorical title suggest about Williams's cultural identity? How else does she use food as a central idea to exp

insens350 [35]

Answer:

The metaphorical title suggests that Williams has a vast mix of ethnicities in his composition. She uses food to show how she can try different things and like them all, exploring them in the most beneficial way possible.

Explanation:

This question is related to the article "Ethnic Hash," where the author talks about her cultural heritage and her cultural inheritance.

In this article the author shows how difficult it was for her to understand her ethnicity, since her family is made up of several different ethnicities, being impossible for her to declare that she belongs to only one of them. This means that the author has a rich cultural background where all these ethnicities mix and interact within her existence.

All this mixture of ethnicities can unbalance her cultural heritage and her cultural inheritance, but just as we do with food, we must balance them by trying everything a little and enjoying different things, exploring and discovering more and more.

3 0

4 years ago