Answer:
C. Analects of Mencius
Explanation:
The Confucianism is a religion, or rather a teaching, a philosophy, that emerged in ancient China. The followers of the Confucianism have been based in China, and still are based in China, thus putting it in the category of national religions. There are several texts that are used and practiced in the Confucianism, and one of the most important texts is the Analects of Mencius. The Analects of Mencius are mostly based around the importance of learning, as well as that everyone is inherently good, but in order to be good throughout the life has to follow the right Way.
An intellectual movement of the renaissance based on the study of humanities
<em><u>what</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>did</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mean</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
- <em><u>are</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>gone</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>crazy</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
- <em><u>oops</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>sorry</u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
