1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erik [133]
4 years ago
7

Australian law may require people to vote, but mandatory voting laws are unlikely to mean that each vote cast in an election ___

_______________________________.
Law
2 answers:
grin007 [14]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Will be an informed or thoughtful vote

Explanation:

Mandatory voting is an effect of law which requires eligible citizens to register and vote and imposes penalties on those who fail to do so.

Since 1924, Australian citizens over the age of 18 have been required to vote in federal elections, by-elections and referendums, and since 1984, voting became compulsory for Indigenous Australians. Since voting has been made compulsory for eligible Australian citizens, an average turnout of 90% has always been recorded in any voting exercise. Citizens that fail to participate in the general elections are  Fined ranging from 20 Australian dollars for missing a federal election, up to 79 Australian dollars for skipping a state poll.

As free citizens, people should be allowed to decide whether or not to participate in a voting exercise or not.  Forcing apathetic or uneducated citizens to vote steers the nation’s political destiny towards populism. An apathetic voter may cast a blank or marred ballot as a protest. Others may vote for a candidate without considering what benefits the decision will have on the nation because they are just being compelled to vote and not of their own volition.

Educating voters on the benefits of voting is a better way of enhancing mass voting than mere compulsion. Sensitization will allow citizens to see the need to vote and make a thoughtful decision on who to vote for.

Grace [21]4 years ago
6 0

Options:

Will matter less than it does in a free society

Is worth the loss of freedom not to vote

Will be an informed or thoughtful vote

Was cast by voters who don't care who wins

Answer:Will be an informed or thoughtful vote.

Explanation:Voting is the process through which people in a democratic setting or Government choose who will govern them. In certain countries or society there are certain laws governing voting in some countries it is mandatory while in other countries it is seen as a Franchise where you can wish to participate or not.

mandatory voting laws are unlikely to mean that each vote cast in an election will be an informed or thoughtful vote.

You might be interested in
Are there any lobbying techniques that should be off limits in a democracy ?
solniwko [45]

Answer:

There is nothing inherently wrong with lobbying. Lobbying encourages people to play an active role in their government — it’s protected by the First Amendment as our right “to petition the government.”

Explanation: to me this can be an opinion.

5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct text in the passage.
Veronika [31]

Answer:

The opportunity cost in this scenario is the three lost opportunities Harry experiences by deciding to go to his parent's house. The term opportunity cost refers to the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. The potential gain Harry may have lost by choosing to go to his parents for dinner instead could be relaxation while fishing, His house painting being finished, and time spent with his friends at the birthday party. These all can be considered lost opportunities due to choosing an alternate opportunity, that being dinner at his parents.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps if so

pls mark brainliest :D

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best defines the term "cost per hire?"
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

you measure the tiatal amount of money invested by the number of hires.

Explanation:

miney invested/ # if hire =

4 0
2 years ago
The right to be tried in the state and district where the crime occurred
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

That statement is found in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

The Amendment states that the accused of a crime shall have the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of the State and district where the crimes were committed. The accused also have the right to be informed of whatever the charges are, be confronted with the witnesses against him and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

I hope this answer helps you.

7 0
3 years ago
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
Reika [66]
Um I don’t understand what this is
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • The argument that drug laws are a tool for the wealthy to control the dangerous classes is consistent with the: Select one: a. C
    10·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following scenarios would be least likely to be classified as a CBRNE incident?
    13·2 answers
  • Characterzes of a dictatorship
    13·2 answers
  • Discuss why the prison environment is not typically ideal for treatment programs and give examples of ideal environments.
    10·1 answer
  • Outline current crime and disorder legislation
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following are major areas of interest in cognitive psychology?
    10·2 answers
  • The pythagorean theorem is a special case of the law of cosines
    14·1 answer
  • What does life with the possibility of parole mean.
    5·1 answer
  • Arrange the steps of a trail process in the correct order. charge to the jury
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!