For personal freedom it’d be the automobile otherwise it would be the railroad system.
Answer:
Text structures as the name implies refers to the architecture of a body of a text. There are text structures where the main idea comes before the details.
Others present the cause of an event followed by the effects of the cause. Another typical structure is where the cause follows the effect. The variations go on and on.
Explanation:
As far as the title is concerned, the text structure is most likely to be a Problem/Solutions Structure. From the topic, it is clear that a Beeless world is a problematic situation. The article is likely to expatiate on how Bees support the world and what would happen if they became extinct. It would then proceed to make a recommendation on how to prevent that.
I think it's a phrase because this sentence doesn't include a verb and clauses have verbs......so..........the answer is a phrase
The character of Editha is a foil, developed to portray the fickleness of the arguments that support war.
The author ironically reveals how Editha repeats the passages from newspapers and magazines supporting the need to go to war. But the author takes a step further to give us a view of Editha’s perception when she says, "But now it doesn't matter about the how or why. Since the war has come, all that is gone. There are no two sides any more. There is nothing now but our country."
Finally, toward the end of the story, Mrs. Gearson sarcastically says, "No, you didn't expect him to get killed," a commentary by the author to show the ignorance of people who idealize war.
Answer:
An Ad Hominem fallacy is when someone personally attacks you to avert the audience from the real point.
Explanation:
<u>Example</u>: Person 1 - <em>"We should raise the minimum wage!"</em>
Person 2 - <em>"Oh please, don't listen to her, she's not even smart</em>
<em> enough to run a business!"</em>
Person 1 attacked Person 2 without even saying why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea. Ad Hominem is when someone insults another person instead of giving reasoning to why their opinion/statement is a bad idea. They try and steer you away from the point so that you agree with them. Maybe Person 1 isn't smart enough to run a business, but maybe she has a good idea in why they should raise the minimum wage.
