i didn't understand ur question can u make it clear
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
Answer:
<h2>
THE NATION NEEDS POTENTIAL SOURCES TO FIGHT CRIME AND SUPPORT VICTIMS.</h2>
<h2>
THE PANEL SHOULD NOT ASCERTAIN WHICH DATA SOURCE PROVIDED THE MOST ACCURATE OF RAOE AND SEXUAL ASSUALT.</h2>
<h2>
ASSESING POTENTIAL ISSUES WITH THE SURVEY.</h2>
A BRAINLIEST PLEASE.
DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION.
