The war in Europe was given more importance by the Allied strategists than the fight in the Pacific or any of the other areas of the conflict.
This is further explained below.
<h3>Who
are Allied strategists?</h3>
Generally, the American military plan called for an "island hopping" operation, in which the US would seize islands closer to Japan and use them as bases for air strikes on Japan, as well as cut off Japanese supplies via submarine warfare against Japanese commerce.
In conclusion, The fighting in Europe was accorded a higher priority by the Allied strategists than the battle in the Pacific or any of the other theaters of the war combined.
Read more about Allied strategists
brainly.com/question/12538368
#SPJ1
Answer:
Racial segregation in the United States Armed Forces, which has included separation of white and non-white American troops, quotas, restriction of people of colour troops to support roles, and outright bans on blacks and other people of colour serving in the military, has been a part of the military history of the United States since the American Revolution. Each branch of the Armed Forces has historically had different policies regarding racial segregation. Although Executive Order 9981 officially ended segregation in the Armed Forces in 1948, following World War II, some forms of racial segregation continued until after the Korean War. The US government complied with an Icelandic government request not to station black soldiers on the US base in Keflavík, Iceland until the 1970s and 1980s when black soldiers began to be stationed in Iceland.
1. Role of textile manufacturing in initiating industrialization
Before industrialization the textile manufacturing system was a slow method, it demanded time and it was usually sold in local communities. But in the 1700s inventors created machines - such as the wheel shuttle and cotton gin - and techniques that improved the textile production made those businesses grow and stimulated the coal and the iron industries.
The boom of textile industrialization boosted the import of raw materials such as cotton, improved transportation of those materials and made the economy move as a whole and initiate industrialization.
2. How transportation technology advanced the Industrial Revolution
Before the Industrial Revolution transport of goods demanded a long time, it took sometimes months to send a letter or to transport something across cities. With the industrial revolution the demand increased, industries needed more and more raw materials and goods to continue production. This pushed the construction of roads, river traffic, steamboats, canals, and railroads. Those transports made production and transportation of goods easier and boosted, even more, the industrial revolution because it permitted to spread selling around the country.
3. Why the first factories were more efficient than the earlier putting-out system
The putting out system is a system that subcontracts work. A central agent contracts subcontractors that complete the work for the agent. This has many problems because it was a domestic system which workers mostly worked from home in pre-urban times.
With the development of new technology such as machines that help with the manufacturing system, the first factories became more efficient because they brought workers and machines together in one place, it increased the production and time of production was smaller.
Peter the Hermit was an attentive listener to Pope Urban II's cries and begged that people have to rescue the Holy Sepulchre. He was a monk and was part of the holy men in the audience. Because he was so stirred with the speech of Pope Urban II, he began preaching to men, women, and children in favor of war against the Turks.
He was able to gather many people and that started the Crusade. Alongside other leaders, he led one side of the troop and began the march. People waged to rescue Jerusalem from the Mohammedans. Therefore, the answer to this item is the first choice.
Answer: 1. the Supreme Court played an important role in the final outcome
Explanation:One unique feature of the presidential election of 2000 between George W Bush and Al Gore is that 1. the Supreme Court played an important role in the final outcome. Normally, if the outcome of the presidential election is not clear, the final decision passes to the House of Representatives for a vote. However, in 2000 the mishandling and miscounting of ballots in Florida resulted in a law suit (Bush v. Gore) and thus the decision over who the electoral votes went to came down to a court decision rather than a House vote.
Mark me as Brainliest
