Answer: because they assumed that it was out of there territory so they were misderected
Explanation: this is what I think about it but hope this help you....
Answer:
I believe your answer should be D, "by using evidence from someone who is an expert in a given area"
D. yes, i bough cleaning supplies, first aid items, and lightbulbs
Answer: i think perhaps she was being positive and optimistic of the day.
Explanation:
Alicia didn't want to ruin the day.
She was convinced that despite what she thought about the day. That it was going to turn out good.
Positivity if you ask me.
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.