All categories

3 years ago

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

gogolik [260]3 years ago

4 0

Graph B because 33.75 divided by 15 is 2.25

Tresset [83]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the answer is a

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Como podríamos saber cuantos camellos le corresponden a cada hermano en realidad

SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

Eldest brother = 18 camels

2nd brother = 12 camels

Youngest brother = 4 camels

Step-by-step explanation:

Question posted:

How could we know how many camels actually correspond to each brother?

It is from "the man who calculated":

The question is incomplete without the background information.

Based on the question, It has to do with sharing an inheritance of 35 camels among 3 brothers.

"The man who calculated", by Malba Tahan.

Since the complete question isn't available, we are going to look at the following question to understand how to do the calculation.

Question:

How can an inheritance of 35 camels be divided among three brothers in such a way that the eldest brother gets half of them, the second one gets 1/3 of the total and the youngest brother gets 1/9 of the total camels?

Solution:

Total number of camels= 35

Eldest brother gets half: 1/2 of 35 gives a fraction and not an whole number

2nd brother = 1/3 of 35 (gives a fraction)

3rd brother = 1/9 of 35 (gives a fraction)

Since we can't have a camel in fraction except in whole number, we would look for the closest number to 35 that would be divided by 2, 3 and 9 respectively without giving a fraction.

Number 36 is the closest number to 35 that satisfies this condition.

1st brother = 1/2 × 36 = 18 camels

2nd brother = 1/3 × 36 = 12 camels

3rd brother = 1/9 × 36 = 4 camels

Now let's add the camels the 3 brother got together = 18 + 12 + 4 = 34 camels

Total camels - amount shared = 35 -34 = 1

Meaning one camel is remaining. The distributor would keep the remaining one as that's the way such distributions could be achieved.

8 0

3 years ago

I need help fast. please help me

galina1969 [7]

ANSWER :

I THINK ITS B

EXPLANATION :

ANSWERED BY THE BEST !!!!

ANGIEEEEEE <3

HOPE YOU DO WELL ON YOUR ASSIGNMENT !!!!! <3

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP FOR BRAINLIEST ANSWER!!!!!!!!

wel

X = 78 degrees

Explanation:
Using the alternate exterior angle of 33 degrees, the angle to the left of x would also be 33 degrees
Using this we add up 69 and 33 = 102
Then we would do 180-102 since a straight line has a total of 180 degrees
The answer would be 78 degrees

3 0

3 years ago

Write the following fraction as a decimal. A. 1.10 B. 10.1 C. 0.1 D. 0.01

skelet666 [1.2K]

A) 1.1/1=11/10

B)10.1/1=101/10

C).1/1=1/10

D).01/1=1/100

you put the number you have to multiply the decimal with to get a whole n.o as the decimal

Hope you found this answer useful

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe and correct the error(s) made in each of the problems below.

ladessa [460]

Answer:

$\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{(5-x)(-x)} =-\frac{x-1 }{ x(x-5)}$

$\displaystyle \frac{5}{s}\times \frac{2}{5} =\frac{2}{s}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Errors in Algebraic Operations

It's usual that students make mistakes when misunderstanding the application of algebra's basic rules. Here we have two of them

When we change the signs of all the terms of a polynomial, the expression must be preceded by a negative sign
When multiplying negative and positive quantities, if the number of negatives is odd, the result is negative. If the number of negatives is even, the result is positive.
Not to confuse product of fractions with the sum of fractions. Rules are quite different

The first expression is

$1-x / (5-x)(-x)=x-1 / x(x-5)$

Let's arrange into format:

$\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{(5-x)(-x)} =\frac{x-1 }{ x(x-5)}$

We can clearly see in all of the factors in the expression the signs were changed correctly, but the result should have been preceeded with a negative sign, because it makes 3 (odd number) negatives, resulting in a negative expression. The correct form is

$\displaystyle \frac{1-x}{(5-x)(-x)} =-\frac{x-1 }{ x(x-5)}$

Now for the second expression

$5/s+2/5=2/s$

Let's arrange into format

$\displaystyle \frac{5}{s}+\frac{2}{5} =\frac{2}{s}$

It's a clear mistake because it was asssumed a product of fractions instead of a SUM of fractions. If the result was correct, then the expression should have been

$\displaystyle \frac{5}{s}\times \frac{2}{5} =\frac{2}{s}$

6 0

3 years ago