Please help it’s Important

History

1 answer:

Anna [14]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

"Support for a standing army to protect the country from foreign threats"

Explanation:

I would pick this because federalism was the idea of having a powerful government. Without a powerful government federalist believed it'd be easier for other countries to take over.

"worries that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny" is anti-federalist ideology (those who opposed a powerful government)

"commitment to states being able to deal with their own political affairs" is also anti-federalist ideology

"resentment toward oppressive British policies during the colonial period" would be my next guess but i believe that wasnt one of the main motives for federalism

You might be interested in

Most settlers looking to find gold go to

irina [24]

Answer:

I think the answer is California

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is a non-example of popular sovereignty?

jenyasd209 [6]

Example of non popular sovereignty is : annexing a state in the south and assuming that it's gonna be a slave stateExample of popular sovereignty : The ability to vote

5 0

4 years ago

PART A: What are TWO central ideas in this text?

spayn [35]

Answer:

Unknown.

Explanation:

Sorry but you will have to at least provide a sample of the text and which sentences you think may be right so other users can help you and assist you towards the right answer!

Personally from my experience in history and english answer choice A cannot be the answers so you can go ahead and disregard the answer choice! And B is not the answer choice either. Which means this also lead you to C and D from Part A.

Part B: Really hard to understand that as well I suggestion you using the command (Ctrl + F) if you have a PC and type some of those words into the little box if more information is highlighted about that answer within the texts that is the correct answer! (Learn that little trick in school)

Best of luck and hope I could help a little.

_Cheers! :D

5 0

4 years ago

Which best summarizes the section titled modern origami

notka56 [123]

Um could you repost the question its not fully on the website

3 0

3 years ago

Why were european countries able to conquer so much of the world

stepan [7]

Europe, has more advances in technology in warfare, transportations. Also their governments are strong and stable due to ones careful rule.
But the real reason for European dominant is because they really and I mean really focus on their militaristic aspect as which they relied on for stability, conquest, and glory because thousands of years, Kings and some Queens are tought the ways of war and how war can give more than just territory and as a matter of fact Kings had trained themselves in Europe for milania, so not just did Kings evolve but the technology to fight among themselves were drastically improved as well.

I hope I was a little help to you

5 0

4 years ago