1st Answer.<span>The captain wanted John to talk to the men and get then avoid mutiny for as long as possible.
2nd Answer.</span>Jim's first mad notion was when he stowed away on one if the boats going ashore the first Morning on the island.
3rd Answer.Jim witnessed long John stab and murder Tom.
4th Answer.The man of the island was Ben Gunn and he was marooned by the shipmates after telling them if the treasure and they though her was lying so they abandoned him.
PLEASE MARK THE ANSWER AS BRAINLIEST
<span>
</span>
When you have information from one source that will be used in consecutive sentences, the information should be cited as one in-text citation at the end of the second sentence only. Multiple in-text citations to the similar work over a large piece of text can be visually clashing and is not fully compulsory.
The rule of thumb is to cite the very first sentence, make it clear you are still talking about the same work in your consecutive sentences and then make sure you are still talking about the work by adding another citation at the end (if this has continued for several sentences).
to know more about in-text citation click below
brainly.com/question/17615328
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I think it’s b but I’m not 100% sure
I believe the correct answers are:
- an Indo-European language of Germanic origin: this is definitely true as old English (as well as modern English) belongs to the Germanic group of languages, along with Scandinavian languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Icelandic), German, Yiddish, etc. And all of them are Indo-European languages
- depended on inflections to indicate gender: this statement is also true. Old English, also known as Anglo-Saxon English, used different suffixes to denote the gender of a noun. So if a noun was female, it would have a different suffix from that of male/neuter gender. This has mostly disappeared from modern English.
- depended on inflections to indicate grammatical form: this statement is also true. Old English used different suffixes to denote the form of a word, such as the tense, or possessive form, etc. This is something that modern English has kept as well, and you can see it in -ed suffix for past tense, or 's used for possessive form.
These three options are definitely correct, whereas 'similar to modern English' is definitely incorrect because they almost look nothing alike. I'm not sure about the mixture of many languages though - it had many dialects, but ultimately it was one Germanic/Viking language, so I don't think other languages influenced it a lot at the time - that came later with Middle English.