Answer:
The company can file antidumping case against the leading foreign rivals. The probability of winning the case is only high when there is cash deposits near to zero in the country and balance of payment is negative.
Explanation:
There can be a law suit files against the foreign rivals but the company will have to bear lawyers fee for this. There is a threat to employment of labor in the home country as most of the goods are imported so factories in the home country will be moved towards shut down because consumers will be buying imported goods which are offered at low price.
Answer:
Export management companies
Explanation:
Export management companies acst as the export sales department for a manufacturer.
Export management companies refers to firms that helps in the distribution of goods produced by other firm's in the international market. They export goods on behalf of other firm's.
Export management companies are independent companies that provides support services for other firms engaged in exporting. Services rendered by export management companies includes: insuring, billing, shipping, warehousing among others.
They also help to provide important information that will improve the quality of product to firms who hire them.
Answer:
yaah lower is only the answer
Answer:
a. $0.20
b. $322,000
Explanation:
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the cost of an asset to the income statement over the estimated useful life of that asset.
It is determined as the depreciable value of the asset over the estimated useful life of the asset where the depreciable value is the difference between the cost and salvage value of the asset
.
The amount of depreciation to be recognized for each mile that a rental automobile is driven
= ($15,000 - $6,000)/45,000
= $9,000/45,000
= $0.20
Total millage expected of the 60 cars before disposal
= 60 * 45,000 miles
= 2,700,000 miles
The total amount of depreciation expense that Central Auto Rentals should recognize on this fleet of cars for the year
= 1,610,000/2,700,000 * ($9,000 * 60)
= $322,000
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
