Answer:
For a good analysis of the painting and to answer precisely what is asked, you should consider this:
1 - to analyze the movement, just explain the technique used by the artist. How it looks to the eye, is the movement fluid? How the brush was used to create this movement, and how the brush strokes are used on the canvas?
2 - in the case of physical analysis, you should consider if the artist had achieved the proposal to follow the movement correctly. In other words, if the artist was correct to portray this element. Another thing you should put into consideration is the strength he used in the brush strokes in order to achieve the illusion of movement.
3 - Finally, you have to explain how these elements contributed to creating the illusion of movement, and how our senses perceive this point. Just explain what you could see, based on your experience and feelings looking at the canvas.
Explanation:
All shapes can be classified into 3D and 2D types.
3D- Three-dimensional model that displays a picture or item in a form that appears to be physically present with a designated structure. Essentially, it allows items that appeared flat to the human eye to be display in a form that allows for various dimensions to be represented. These dimensions include width, depth, and height.
2D- A shape with only two dimensions (such as width and height) and no thickness. Appears flat to a persons eyes.
When you are talking to someone and you want a certain phrase you said to stand out, you emphasis your words. That is pretty much the same case here. A is incorrect because that is capturing a model of some sort, B is incorrect because that would be an equal blend of all colors together, and D is incorrect because you are not uniting the colors, you want the elements to stand out. Emphasis is achieved usually by using mostly dark colors then a splash of something such as neon pink or yellow.
