Answer:TRUE
Explanation:COERCIVE FORCE is a force applied to a person or a group of persons in order to make them carry out an involuntary action or actions. It is used by employers of labor in order to mandate their employees to carry out certain activities. All Employees are required by their employers to obey the rules and regulations guiding the establishment even when it is not based on the interest of the employees.
Answer:
b)
Annual Depreciation expense= $58,800
Explanation:
<em>According to International Accounting standards(IAS) 16 property plan and equipment (PPE), the cost of an asset is the purchase cost plus other costs of bringing it to the intended working conditions.</em>
So we will add the purchase cost to installation , freight charges.
Cost of assets = 300,000 + 14,000 + 40,000 =$354,000
Annual depreciation = (Cost - Scrap Value)/ Number of years
= (354,000 - 60,000)/5
=$58,800
Annual Depreciation expense= $58,800
Okay. So it's $10,000 per year, which is $100,000 in 10 years. I'm not so sure how to solve it exactly, but I found a lump sum calculator online. I put the information on that and according to the calculator, today's payment in a lump sum would be $50,894.93. The future value is $100,000 with 10 periods (in this case, years) of the interest rate of 7% once per year. I think that the answer is $50,894.93.
It is important to keep the questionnaire really short, probably just one good question or a checkbox list would suffice. Hand out the questionnaire once they buy or rent the cds/dvds at the counter. They shall answer it out while you process the receipt and give change. This should come around smoothly and won't be much of a hassle for the customer.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
