Answer:
The statement that summarizes accurately the differences between the peace parting from democrats and the war democrats is:
Even though former president lincoln military policies' were not the best to guarantee peace, it was the only one available after the situation the country lived. Thus, the democrat party was divided into a side that supported former president lincoln and one that supported George McLellan. Thus, when Lincoln won, many democrats that didn't support former president Lincolns' military policies became republicans and they fought for a separation of the confederation from the federation.
Explanation:
Democrats were divided in two groups as a cause of former president Lincoln military policies. But his win in the 1864 election, launch them to his opposition. Then, the confederation made its move and the scalations originated the civil war. This late group that didn't support former president lincoln military policies' was called copperheads.
<u><em>European colonialism and colonization were known as the practice of acquiring full or partial political control over the societies and territories through the creation of a colony, occupying it with settlers and utilizing it economically. </em></u>
<u><em>The reason why the European could colonize the no- european regions were basically because they didn’t have an advanced military equipment and there wasn’t a leader that could keep united the various groups. Finally they were debilitated by trade restrictions and embargo.</em></u>
The 2003 Texas redistricting refers to a controversial mid-decade congressional redistricting plan. In the 2004 elections, it resulted in the Republicans taking a majority of Texas's House seats for the first time since Reconstruction. Opponents challenged the plan in three suits, combined when the case went to the United States Supreme Court in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry.
On June 28, 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the statewide redistricting as constitutional, with the exception of Texas' 23rd congressional district, which it held was racially gerrymandered in violation of Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, apparently to try to protect a Hispanic Republican representative. A three-judge Federal District Court redrew District 23 and four other nearby districts: 15, 21, 25, and 28. In November 2006, a special election was held in the new districts, with all incumbents winning except in District 23. There, Republican incumbent Henry Bonilla was forced into a December run-off which he lost to Democratic challenger Ciro Rodriguez. I hope this helps!
