1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinil7 [7]
4 years ago
7

Explain why Roman conquerors gave full citizenship to people in Latin cities. Why did the conquered people throughout the rest o

f Italy receive only half citizenship?
History
2 answers:
balandron [24]4 years ago
5 0

The Romans granted the people in Latin cities full citizenship because they all shared a common language. The Latin communities were immersed in Roman culture, because much of their land was given to Romans. The Latin state that was formed was able to subdue and conquer all of the non-Latin Italian communities. The conquered people were given only half citizenship because, even though they were part of the Italian peninsula, they had little in common with the Romans.

jeka944 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Roman conquerors gave full citizenship to people in Latin cities because of their Latin language, Romans also spoke Latin. The conquered people throughout the rest of Italy received only half citizenship, because they didn't speak the Romans' language.

Explanation:

Its factual

You might be interested in
Someone help me with this today please
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:good luck

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
What happens to the Reichstag building? Who was responsible? Who is blamed? How does Hitler use that to his advantage?
Vladimir [108]

The Reichstag Fire was a dramatic arson attack occurring on February 27, 1933, which burned the building that housed the Reichstag (German parliament) in Berlin.

4 0
2 years ago
Which political candidate was supported by the religious act
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

pat robertson

Explanation:

just did the assignment

5 0
3 years ago
Which describes what the Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) and the Compromise of 1850 had in common? A. They both attempt
timurjin [86]

<span>A. They both attempted to preserve the Union. Both compromise sought to satisfy both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in government. Both sought to find ways to ensure that there was a balance between the two sides.  The Kansas-Nebraska Act however, destroyed that balance and later led to Civil War.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
URGENT ANSWER
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

I'm not positive here but I believe it's a

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Political action committees (PACs) are limited in how many they can raise money. One restriction is that PACs that are branches
    11·1 answer
  • What were key factors in creating a strong wartime economy? new technologies, new methodologies, full labor force, government di
    12·2 answers
  • What are two things the Wagner Act accomplished during the Great Depression?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the name of the policy of economic expansion which was introduced by President William Howard Taft?
    14·2 answers
  • How did The Prince change European thinking?
    12·1 answer
  • Which one is correct ​
    13·2 answers
  • . An aqueduct is a famous house in Athens.<br> True or false?
    5·2 answers
  • How are the black code laws and the jim crow laws similar
    6·2 answers
  • 4
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence did not play an important role in defining the Const
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!