The portuguese established military bases in different key locations in Asia and created a trading post empire: to be able control trade routes by forcing merchant ships to pay duties. They didn't want to control the territory, just the commerce and they ended up selling shipping services.
The Spanish had different plans. They gave gifts and do favors to the Philippines's chiefs in order to gain control over them. They also used Catholicism to control their subjects and promised them a better life only if they worshipped their god. This way they achieved the total control over the territory and silver production.
The Dutch controlled shipping and production of cloves, cinnamon, nutmeg and mace. They took control of a several South East Asian spice producing islands and forced their people to sell only to the them. If they refused to this condition, they destroyed crops. Private trading companies gave the Dutch financing and made them commercially sophisticated.
Since the Dutch kept the British out o the spice monopoly, they settled in India. They weren't able to take over because the Mughal Empire extremely strong, but the got permission to establish trading bases using subtantial payments and bribes. They were focused on Indian cotton textiles, which were a huge demand in Europe.
Relating to the rights of the accused, the courts are generally moving away from individual protections and toward "enhanced" government powers.<span>
The sixth amendment grants special rights to the accused like speedy trial, right to an attorney etc.</span>
Answer: Over the decade following passage of the Stamp Act in 1765, a series of unpopular British laws met with stiff opposition in the colonies, fueling a bitter struggle over whether Parliament had the right to tax the colonists without the consent of the representative colonial governments.
The Declaration of Independence was written for two reasons. First, as the name suggests, it was intended to declare the independence of Britain's North American colonies from their mother country. This, the document explains, is why the colonists took up arms, and why they are declaring independence.
The response of Charles I to the British parliament's Petition of Rights was <u>A. He refused to sign it</u> as a violation of his divine right to rule and <u>dissolved </u><u>parliament</u>.
<h3>What was the Petition of Rights?</h3>
The Petition of Rights was the constitutional protection of individual rights against the state.
Four principles were recognized in the Petition of Rights, including:
- No taxation without the consent of Parliament
- No imprisonment without cause
- No quartering of soldiers on subjects
- No martial law in peacetime.
However, the Petition of Rights was not initially consented to by the King, who insisted on his royal powers to rule and deal without the parliament.
Thus, Charles I <u>A. He refused to sign </u>the British parliament's Petition of Rights and <u>dissolved </u><u>parliament</u>.
Learn more about the Petition of Rights at brainly.com/question/618194
#SPJ1
