Answer:
How the Articles of Confederation were set up caused the central government to haveslight authority that could not really be enforced. The states had agreed to "worktogether" but were not truly unified. The Articles had given too much power to the statestherefore setting up a truly weak, centralized government. Shay's rebellion highlightedweaknesses within the papers themselves. For example, the central government had nofunds, as they had no authority to tax the people. This meant that there was no fundedmilitary to help stop the rebellion. It was up to the state of Massachusetts to fund theirown militia to put a stop to Shay's Rebellion. At the same time, this meant that the statestruly could get away with almost anything they wanted to do. If the central government did not have the resources to go after them, why would the States feel obligated to adhere to national policies? The clear flaws of the Articles brought a divide between the people
Explanation:
Spatial and temporal components, such as international trade, global levels of political representation, global communication, the increased speed of transactions, travel, political change, resource depletion, social mobilization and impacts of increased cultural exchange has undoubtedly increased the level of global
Answer:
D. England and France were fighting for control of the fur trade west of the Appalachian Mountains.
Explanation:
Both England and France wanted to control the territory west of the Appalachian Mountains, more specifically: the Ohio River Valley.
France considered the Ohio River Valley to be part of New France, and England considered it to be part of Virginia.
Both European powers not only wanted to control the fur trade in the area, but also wanted to clear land for future settlement.
The answer is nationalism. Both leaders wanted to free their
countries from the foreign rul. They had gathered all their supporters in order
to unify them under King and stage an uprising. Both leaders became successful and
were able to regain sovereignty in their respective countries
Answer:
<u>Painting "The Last Supper"</u>
- It is a mural painting made between 1495 and 1498 by Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) did not charge for this painting. It was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza for the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy.
- The artist uses the vanishing perspective or linear perspective, which is a characteristic of Renaissance art. The main focus of his perspective is the character of Jesus, who is the center of reference for artistic composition.
- Leonardo Davinci combines the use of vanishing perspective with the classical architectural representation, creating the illusion that the space in the convent where the painting was located seemed wider.
- Another characteristic element of the Renaissance was the use of a window system to introduce natural light sources and spatial depth into the paintings. In “The Last Supper”, the lighting comes from the three windows in the background.
<u>Painting "The Ambassadors"
</u>
- The painting is actually called “Jean de Dinteville and Georges de Selve”. It was created by Hans Holbein the Younger in 1533.
- In this work, two characters look directly at the viewer, a very new effect for the time.
- In the lower part there is an element that gives a complex character to the painting: it looks like a deformed human skull. Technically it is an anamorphosis, that is, an intentional deformation of an image that can only be corrected by an optical effect such as a curved mirror. This innovative technique forces the viewer to be in a specific perspective to be able to see the image correctly.
