1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
icang [17]
3 years ago
9

A local car dealer offers "zero percent" interest on a $20,000 automobile for 36 monthly payments. if a customer either pays cas

h or makes other financing arrangements, there is a discount of $2,000 from the car company. professor ross, an engineering economics professor at a major university, says taking loan at 5% annual interest compounded monthly for three years from a credit union will be economically attractive considering $2,000 the rebate. is he right?
Business
2 answers:
m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The professor is wrong; the buyer should directly pay the car company at zero interest.

Explanation:

Lets first list down all the facts:

There are two options for the consumer - the first being pay directly cash to the car company at 0% interest or take a loan of the same amount. The discount is the same if the buyer manages to pay in time.

36 monthly payments implies 3 year period.

Use a spreadsheet to enter the above data and calculate the values. You have to calculate the NPV (net present value) of the investment in both the scenarios taking account of the rebate and the subsequant gain/loss in each option. Most spreadsheets use the NPV function, including Numbers for Mac.

Take the case for the first option, where interest is zero. These are the values that were found out:

For each year, cash flow is approx. $6,660 that makes upto $555.55 each month. This is the required payment the buyer needs to pay to the car company each year to be eligible for a discount.

In the end, the car will cost almost $18,000.

Now take the case for loan payment which has an interest of 5%.

As quite evident, the loan actually increases the pay burden, since the buyer has to pay the full $6,660 yearly to the car company in addition to paying interest to the bank which is almost $335 each year. So the total amount every year, to the buyer's account statement will be approx. $7000, a loss of more than $300 when compared to the previous situation.

In the end, the car will cost him more than $900 (almost $20,980), due to interest adding up every year. The dsicount of $2,000 will of course reduce the price of it, to like $18,980 but that is still $900 more than the zero interest offered by the car company.

Hence, according to my calculations, the professor is wrong; the buyer should directly pay the car company at zero interest.

Musya8 [376]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The economics professor is wrong because the present value of the loan is $18,535, while the present value of paying for the car in cash is $18,000.

Explanation:

You have to determine the present value of an annuity, I personally like to do it on excel because it allows you to make changes and compare situations.

  • n = 36 monthly payments
  • payment = $20,000 / 36 = $555.55555 (excel doesn't require you to round numbers)
  • interest = 5% / 12 = 0.4166666% monthly

Using the NPV function =NPV(0.4167%, cells 1 - 36 $555.5555 each)

NPV = $18,535

Since you are trying to lower expenses, you must choose the lowest NPV.

You might be interested in
Suppose the government requires each firm to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by an equal amount such that total emissions are re
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

is not efficient because firms can have different costs of reducing pollution.

Explanation:

Economic efficiency is the way a business maximises the use of factors of production (land, labor, capital) to produce output at a reduced cost. Efficiency aims to improve output and reduce cost to the barest minimum.

In this instance to individual cost required to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions is not considered by the government.

Since reduction of sulfur dioxide is equal among firms, some smaller ones may incur cost that will financially impair them and put them out of business.

While bigger firms will easily bear the cost.

7 0
3 years ago
By participating in as many newsworthy events as possible, such as visiting orphanages or disaster sites, candidates are often a
nikdorinn [45]
I would say in these cases where candidates are being seen at disaster sites or orphanages for example, they are attempting to catch media attention for their apparent humanitarian qualities and thus garner support amongst the voters.
6 0
3 years ago
"The Internet of everything (IOE) has created a lot of excitement in the business community. What evidence could you present to
joja [24]

Answer:

Yes, the Internet of everything (IOE) has created a lot of excitement in the business community.

Explanation:

IOT has come to revolutionalized our life in many ramifications. It is regarded as the best and fastest means of connecting to the people as well as machines around world. It effect ranging from Aviation, Education, Health Care Services, and so on. Business operation have witnessed significant improvement in the sense that things get done over the Internet easily. One buy and sell, services such as consultancy are rendered over the Internet.

Example

The example is Telecom Industry.

It effect could be seen in communication, is those days where there was no internet, mail or letter are delivered taking longer period and sometime may even get loss but with Telecommunications, introduction of e-mail come where letters is being delivered within seconds.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the monopolist having a declining long-run average cost throughout the market?
balandron [24]
The appropriate response is a Natural monopoly, it is a sort of imposing a business model that exists thus of the high repaired expenses or begin expenses of working a business in a particular industry. Furthermore, normal imposing business models can emerge in ventures that require one of a kind crude materials, innovation or other comparative variables to work.
3 0
3 years ago
In which of the following scenarios would you have the most money at the end of the year? 3% compounded yearly 2% compounded mon
larisa [96]
3% compounded yearly<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Carol was preparing for the next employee appraisal at her company. She already had her work accomplishments documented and read
    6·2 answers
  • Adventure holidays sells thousands of tour packages each month through its branches. a branch manager's salary would be a(n) ___
    8·1 answer
  • The government of Ruritania has implemented many programs that promote equality, but has become concerned about the very slow ra
    7·1 answer
  • A recent college graduate from Clayton State University has the choice of buying a new car for $33,500 or investing the money fo
    8·1 answer
  • Morrow Enterprises Inc. manufactures bathroom fixtures. The stockholders’ equity accounts of Morrow Enterprises Inc., with balan
    12·1 answer
  • Stock A's beta is 1.5 and Stock B's beta is 0.5. Which of the following statements must be true, assuming the CAPM is correct. a
    6·1 answer
  • One reason to buy a home instead of rent a home is:
    10·2 answers
  • Levi Corporation (a U.S. company) has several transactions with foreign entities. Each transaction is denominated in the local c
    13·1 answer
  • A project has several teams. Team C has repeatedly missed deadlines in the past. This has caused team D to have to crash the cri
    11·1 answer
  • on january 1 of year 1, congo express airways issued $3,400,000 of 7% bonds that pay interest semiannually on january 1 and july
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!