Both figures have facial features, more details on the face than on the body and both are wearing hats.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The two statues have a face, which resembles a human face. In these faces, we can see eyes, noses, and a mouth.
- The two statues have a very simple body, without details that draw attention, unlike the face, which has many details that draw a lot of attention.
- We can also see that the two statues are wearing an accessory on their head, which is a hat.
You only showed one image in your question, however, through questions like yours, we can see the second image. This image is shown below.
More information:
brainly.com/question/17829486
Answer:
the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security
the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient"
can be conducted by a government, private institutions, and corporations
Might because mi te and might sound the same
at least I think
<span>SparkNotes: The Kite Runner: Chapters 12–13</span>
Answer:
The author's main argument in his essay was to tell how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
Explanation:
'Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs' is an essay written by Stephen Jay Gould, a Professor of Geology at Harvard University.
In his essay he explains how dinosaurs extinction took place by elaborating the three elements– sex, drugs, and disaster. By detailing each and every aspects, Gould presents how a good scientific proposal is elaborated. He starts his essay by defining science and how conclusions are reached through series of consequences and not by fascination. Then he goes on the explain his points and reaching the conclusion of his thesis.
Therefore, the main argument by Gould in this essay was to educate his readers how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.
