Answer:
Hindsight bias
Explanation:
Most individuals usually seem to perceive that they have a clearer picture or better knowledge of an event after such incident or happening has occurred, prompting then to think that they had a good knowledge of the occurrence before it occurred than they actually do.
For instance, after so many incidents, eyewitnesses or other individuals usually claim they knew what happened would actually occur. Owing to the fact that the incident has actually occurred, they say their claim with much more swagger than than they usually do before the incident.
I would say who because it is calling for them in the context of who because they were just mentioned.
Answer:
Foreign investment regulations Trade policy Taxation rules Labor freedom
Explanation:
Answer:
if you look up your qestion it will give you the answer so you knw in the fucher i hope this helped
Explanation:
Answer:
Imagine that you and your friends went out for the night. You and 2 other friends decide to go destroy property and trespass on fields. The other friend didn’t do it, but does have it on video and did watch it happen. Well if interdependent wasn’t a thing, then your friends couldn’t depend on that friend to keep it a secret. Get it?
