All categories

3 years ago

Can there be more than one coefficient in a expression?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Lorico [155]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

take for example

in the expression: 3x²+5x+2=0,

the coefficients here are +3 and +5 while +2 is a constant. +3 and +5 are coefficients of the variables x² and x respectively

You might be interested in

Find the first, fourth, and tenth terms of the arithmetic sequence described by the given rule.

lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

The answer is option C.

Step-by-step explanation:

The arithmetic sequence is given by

$A(n) = - 6 + (n - 1)( \frac{1}{5} )$

where n is the number of terms

For the first term

n = 1

So we have

$A(1) = - 6 + (1 - 1)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 6 + (0)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 6$

For the fourth term

n = 4

$A(4) = - 6 + (4 - 1)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 6 + (3)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 5 \frac{2}{5}$

For the tenth term

n = 10

$A(10) = - 6 + (10 - 1)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 6 + (9)( \frac{1}{5} )$

$= - 4 \frac{1}{5}$

Hope this helps you

4 0

3 years ago

Cora paid 16/100 of a dollar to buy a postcard from Grand Canyon National park in Arizona. What is 65/100 written as a

Lana71 [14]

Answer:

$.65 (sixty five cents)

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

SOMEONE, PLEASE ANSWER ALL OF THESE PLEASE WHOEVER ANSWERS THEM ALL FIRST WILL GET BRAINLIEST

marissa [1.9K]

The answer to 10 is 17x^2y^3

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is a Pythagorean triple?

garik1379 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a certain region, about 6% of a city's population moves to the surrounding suburbs each year, and about 4% of the suburban po

Sedbober [7]

Answer:

City @ 2017 = 8,920,800

Suburbs @ 2017 = 1, 897, 200

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution:

- Let p_c be the population in the city ( in a given year ) and p_s is the population in the suburbs ( in a given year ) . The first sentence tell us that populations p_c' and p_s' for next year would be:

0.94*p_c + 0.04*p_s = p_c'

0.06*p_c + 0.96*p_s = p_s'

- Assuming 6% moved while remaining 94% remained settled at the time of migrations.

- The matrix representation is as follows:

$\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}p_c\\p_s\end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{c}p_c'\\p_s'\end{array}\right]$

- In the sequence for where x_k denotes population of kth year and x_k+1 denotes population of x_k+1 year. We have:

$\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right] x_k = x_k_+_1$

- Let x_o be the populations defined given as 10,000,000 and 800,000 respectively for city and suburbs. We will have a population x_1 as a vector for year 2016 as follows:

$\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right] x_o = x_1$

- To get the population in year 2017 we will multiply the migration matrix to the population vector x_1 in 2016 to obtain x_2.

$x_2 = \left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right] x_o$

- Where,

$x_o = \left[\begin{array}{c}10,000,000\\800,000\end{array}\right]$

- The population in 2017 x_2 would be:

$x_2 = \left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}0.94&0.04\\0.06&0.96\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{c}10,000,000\\800,000\end{array}\right] \\\\\\x_2 = \left[\begin{array}{c}8,920,800\\1,879,200\end{array}\right]$

5 0

3 years ago