Answer:
magma viscosity
magma temperature
amount of dissolved gases
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Hi, fellow AP Human Geographer. Basically, all that arithmetic density means the total number of people per unit of land area. Having said that, we can immediately eliminate A. because increasing the population would only increase the total number of ppl. per unit of land area. Next, B. B can work, theoretically; however, there is a better answer. Next, D. D. says limiting the number of farmers; while this will technically reduce the number of ppl. per unit of land area, again there is a better answer. Next, E. I'd say this is the toughest choice; however, by increasing the area of urban areas, it can end up attracting more people instead. Overall, the best answer would be C., limiting the size of the population.
A mabilis Lang po Pala Yan ah sabagay di Mo pa yan na experience ngayun Lang ako na experience ko na Yan Salamat god bless
The answer to whether the data is convincing is; Yes, it is true that the data is convincing
<h3>How to create hypothesis?</h3>
We are given;
Population Proportion; p = 17.6% = 0.176
Sample size; n = 300
Sample proportion; p^ = 45/300 = 0.15 = 15%
Formula for standard deviation here is;
σ = √(pq/n)
σ = √(p(1 - p)/n)
σ = √(0.15 * 0.85/300)
σ = 0.0206
Formula for z-score is;
z = (p^ - p)/σ
z = (0.176 - 0.15)/0.0206
z = 1
From online p-value from z-score at significance level of 0.05, we have;
p = 0.1587
The p-value is greater than the significance value and so we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the proportion of underemployed residents in Thicksburg is lower than elsewhere in the country.
Read more about Hypothesis at; brainly.com/question/15980493
