The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the text or the excerpt for reference.
There are also no options attached.
What response? From who? What is the reference?
However, trying to help, we can comment on the following general terms.
What does his response tell you about the Framers' intentions regarding the institutional design of the judiciary?
You are probably referring to Federalists Alexander Hamilton's opinion about the judiciary.
If that is the case, then we can say that Alexander Hamilton wrote the Federalists Paper n.- 78, under a pseudonym, and he referred to the importance of the judiciary. He considered that the judiciary was an important institution to help and protect the people from bad or abusive legislation.
Hamilton also thought that the judiciary was important to enforce the legislation included in the US Constitution. Hamilton thought that the judiciary had the obligation to interpret the legislation to correctly apply it, and also should be the institution to keep an eye on Congress in order to limit it to exceed its powers.
Answer:
u r really a very great girl ummaaaaaa ?????
Explanation:
howw r u dear
Cuz you have to eat bootie
Political efficacy is the ability to influence government and politics, a perceived lack of political efficacy reflects a lack of faith in government, where citizens feel that their actions do not affect government and their political leaders. Efficacy normally increases with age and when people feel low political efficacy they tend to feel less engaged and have less strong views.
