1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
15

What is one negative effect that can come from applying modern values to historical events?

History
1 answer:
otez555 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.

You might be interested in
Which battle in the War of 1812 allowed the United States to take control of Lake Erie? A.Battle of Put-in-Bay
Genrish500 [490]

No it is A. battle of Put-In-Bay

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your right to liberty is taken away if you...
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

a) Break a law

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
San Francisco was a focus for asian American reformers in the 1960s because it was
slavikrds [6]
It was where many Asian immigrants opposed reform efforts 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened during the war?<br> What colonies or "territories" did the US obtain during the war?
oksano4ka [1.4K]
The United States acquired Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines as territories.
5 0
3 years ago
What is an example of a Texan’s right to assembly? a. sending a letter to the editor of a local newspaper b. gathering at a peac
Trava [24]

Answer:

b. gathering at a peaceful protest in front of a government building

Explanation:

RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY;

The citizens shall have the right, in a peaceable manner, to assemble together for their common good; and apply to those invested with the powers of government for redress of grievances or other purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.

The First Amendment prohibits government from abridging "the right of the people peaceably to assemble." People are entitled to assemble and to speak and be heard, as long as they remain nonviolent.

Example of this rights includes

Hosting a party, having a board game night with the neighbors, or even going to church are all freedom of assembly examples. The difference, however, is that freedom of assembly protects those whom the government believes may “cause trouble” when they get together.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 44 John Kennedy’s foreign policy differed from Eisenhower’s as it was based on the concept of
    13·1 answer
  • What are some ways to stop genocide? Like the holocaust
    13·1 answer
  • What was the name of the play that was initially banned by the french king for making fun of the nobility?
    9·1 answer
  • What did the Five Civilized Tribes have in common?
    6·1 answer
  • Which artist was NOT a part of the Northern Renaissance?
    6·2 answers
  • Which cane first? Texas Independence or Battle at the alamo. They were both in 1836. Book: United States History by Holt Rinehar
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following areas of Europe had NOT become a unified nation under a single ruler by the 18th century?
    9·1 answer
  • How does India system education work out
    11·1 answer
  • 1.) How can international trade be considered a facet of foreign relations between nations?
    14·1 answer
  • How many years was New York the most populated state?<br> A)206<br> B)3<br> C)79<br> D)157
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!