What Lynn Novick means by sell their story is to make the story go public in a way that it reaches a lot of audience as well as influencing the story.
<h3>The filmmaker Lynn Novick</h3>
This film maker said this due to the fact that she was working on a movie called the Vietnam war.
She was taking on President Nixon who had said that he was modulating the message that he was telling about the events.
Read more on the Vietnam war here
brainly.com/question/182779
Answer:look it up online lol here's what you'd get"The feudal barons forced King John of England to sign the Magna Carta in an attempt to limit his powers by law and protect their rights. In a way, it was the world's very first written Constitution. ... It would inspire the Founding Fathers to draft a new document, the United States Constitution."
Explanation:
so just find out ur answer from that info
Answer:
<em> The acts of Parliament had much to do with </em><em>the taxes on the colonies for the purpose of raising revenues.</em>
Explanation:
They decided that there should be several types of taxes to increase the revenue of the government. They think it was the right of the parliament to do so.
The British parliament believed in the taxation process. Taxes were imposed on and necessity goods. Slowly it hijacked the market and the distribution of income was not equal in the society.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The issues in France in the 1780s that would have been addressed if the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen were enforced would have been the following. First of all, the poverty of the French people who were living in harsh economic conditions. Then, the oppression exerted by the King of France, followed by the injustices suffered by many French who had no rights and voice to express their opinions. If they opposed the King, they were sent to prison with no trail.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen was issued on August 26, 1789, by the French National Constituent Assembly, manifesting that all men had natural and universal rights.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
