1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maru [420]
2 years ago
9

Think about the unit material for a minute. How does cybercrime compare to white collar crime?

Law
1 answer:
4vir4ik [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

White collar crime refers to the crimes that are committed by business men and government employees whereas cyber crimes are committed by hackers, terrorists and others to invade the host computer and network system to derive the information.

The purpose of white collar crime is to not to defame somebody but some cyber crimes exhibit a motive to intentionally harm the reputation of the victim.

The white collar crime can be detected in terms of examination of financial accounting analysis and sale and purchase of goods and services but cyber crime remains undetected due to use of unknown devices to commit the offences the IP address and other required identification proofs cannot be found.

Money laundering and ponzi schemes are the examples of the white collar crimes and hacking, email spoofing are the examples of cyber crime.

You might be interested in
The FBI collects which crime statistics?
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

If this answer helped you then please consider making this brainliest and thank this response :)

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.

Hope this helps

6 0
2 years ago
EASY QUESTION! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
igomit [66]

Answer:

4 years :)

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
BE MY FRIEND I IS LONELY
coldgirl [10]

Answer:

OK. :)

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The quotation below is from Anti-Federalist Patrick Henry.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

read it about 5 times and then you will get it

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • This is the minimum age required by the Constitution for a person to be President.
    7·2 answers
  • Which success factor or reward of IS implementation enables you to see the real-time status or availability of a process or prod
    11·1 answer
  • Who creates and delivers a victim impact statement? 1.The defense attorney 2.The first police officer on the scene 3.The judge 4
    14·1 answer
  • Robert very much wants to hire Jacqueline because she is African American and Beck ‘n’ Call does not have a large enough number
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? (1 point)
    15·1 answer
  • Please help me it’s due today:)
    12·1 answer
  • You make it to a crime scene and notice that there is a trail of footprints going through the
    8·1 answer
  • The jury in Dare County finds a defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. The defendant maintains their innocence and d
    7·1 answer
  • What are the three characteristics of criminal law
    9·2 answers
  • Write a three-minute congress debate speech on the following bill-
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!