Answer:
An <em>organism </em>is any individual living thing but the definition of life is not simple because humans determine what meets the criteria of living and nonliving. However, this does not mean that humans are perfect when it comes to categorization. Viruses fall into a middle area between being classified as living or nonliving since viruses have some, but not all, of the characteristics required to be classified as living.
~Hope this Helps!~
Answer:The changes in land use associated with urban development affect flooding in many ways. Removing vegetation and soil, grading the land surface, and constructing drainage networks increase runoff to streams from rainfall and snowmelt.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. The oxygen deprived cardiac muscles caused chest pain.
2. Unavailability of oxygen and blood supply to skin cells made them pale and cold.
3. Accumulation of blood in pulmonary circuit caused moist sounds.
Explanation:
The left ventricle receives oxygenated blood from the left atrium. Oxygenated blood from the lungs is carried to the left atrium by pulmonary veins. The left ventricle pumps the oxygenated blood to all body parts through the aorta. Failure of the left ventricle deprived the skin cells of oxygenated blood. Oxygen deficiency stopped energy production by cellular respiration. The result was pale and cold skin.
Failure of the left ventricle led to the accumulation of blood in the pulmonary circuit since the blood was not delivered to body tissues. The build-up of blood and resultant higher blood pressure caused moist sounds in the lower lungs.
The blockage of the coronary artery by a blood clot and death of a part of the heart due to lack of oxygen leads to a heart attack. The dead heart tissue is known as infarct and the resultant heart attack is myocardial infarction. Chest pain is caused due to the dead heart tissue or infarct.
Answer:
1. It should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. There are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but I can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.
2. Yes. First, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. The pros involve better medical treatment. The cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. Looking at DNA markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. And OK, actually I suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency.
Brainliest pleaseeeee??
