The Arab Spring was a loosely related group of protests that ultimately resulted in regime changes in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. Not all of the movements, however, could be deemed successful—at least if the end goal was increased democracy and cultural freedom. In fact, for many countries enveloped by the revolts of the Arab Spring, the period since has been hallmarked by increased instability and oppression. Given the significant impact of the Arab Spring throughout northern Africa and the Middle East, it’s easy to forget the series of large-scale political and social movements arguably began with a single act of defiance.
The Arab Spring began in December 2010 when Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest the arbitrary seizing of his vegetable stand by police over failure to obtain a permit. Bouazizi’s sacrificial act served as a catalyst for the so-called Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia. The street protests that ensued in Tunis, the country’s capital, eventually prompted authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to abdicate his position and flee to Saudi Arabia. He had ruled the country with an iron fist for more than 20 years.
Answer:
The correct answer is to benefit colonial peoples
Explanation:
To benefit colonial is the right answer because Kipling was someone who proclaimed the idea that European colonial powers are taking on their back the obligation to illuminate Native people of the colonies. They are actually sacrificing according to Kipling, so they could help them evolve.
That is why other options are false.
Europeans have no benefit. They are "helping."
It was "d. Stephen Douglas" who <span>wrote the legislation in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, since this act was intended to avert a Civil War between the slave interests in the South and the abolitionists in the North. </span>
<u>The conditions on the ships during the Middle Passage are:</u>
- Dirty from humans being that close to one another
- Smelly from vomit
- No room to move
- Diseases spread quickly
- It was best to be at the top of the bunks than at the bottom
<u>Explanation:</u>
The slaves were treated with cruelty. They used to load so many slaves in one ship that they all had no space to move. They were all shackled. There was no proper hygiene available.
Only buckets were provided for excretion. That too wasn't for everyone to use. Diseases spread so fast that it killed 1000s of slaves.
Despite of appropriate availability of food. Small quantity was brought in the ship and there was never enough food to feed the slaves.
D would be the correct answer
