Answer:
number 3 lang ung X 1 2 4 5 heart na
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
support
Explanation:
The operation of any organization includes 2 part: main activities and support activities.
Whilst main activities are to deliver the purpose of business (profit or any social purposes), but these main activities can't smoothly run without support activities from human resources, infrastructure layout, technology....
Answer:
B. No effect on net income; no effect on total assets
Explanation:
When you write off bad debt, the journal entry is:
Dr Allowance for doubtful accounts XYZ
Cr Accounts receivable XYZ
This actually had no effect on the income statement, since the allowance account is already a contra asset account.
When the write off is reversed because the customer paid the debt, the journal entry is:
Dr Accounts receivable XYZ
Cr Allowance for doubtful accounts XYZ
Dr Cash XYZ
Cr Accounts receivable XYZ
Again, since the company is using the allowance method, there is no real effect on the income statement nor total assets in the balance sheet.
