Answer:
A. Increased perception of quality by customers
Explanation:Work-family conflict is a term used to describe the imbalance created by the incompatible Demands by the responsibilities of a person at work and the person's responsibility at home.
WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT IS A MAJOR FACTOR CAUSING LOW EMPLOYEE MORALE ESPECIALLY FOR NURSING WOMEN,REDUCED WORK PERFORMANCE AND HIGH ABSENTEEISM ETC AMONG WORKERS.
When an employer puts systems in place to helps reduce the impact of this Work-family conflicts most of the performance related backslides in Organisations will be effectively managed.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
A statement of cash flows on tracks Cash, not credit, expenses, or any of that jazz. There are other financial reports to account for them.
Answer:
D) Quantity sold rose while the effect on price is ambiguous.
Explanation:
Two separate things happened here;
- Change in consumer habits have shifted the the demand curve to the right, increasing the quantity demanded at every price level.
- Better technology and lower costs have also shifted the supply curve to the right, increasing the quantity supplied at every price level.
One thing is certain, the quantity demanded and supplied increased, so the total quantity sold definitely increased. The price issue is not certain because you would need additional information about which shift was larger, the shift of the supply curve or the demand curve.
Answer:
Leslie is correct
Explanation:
It is the duty of the real estate agents to inspect properties properly before signing listing agreement or contracts. In this scenario, Katherine did not do her inspection job properly and if in this scenario, Leslie buys the house and finds out about the leaky roof, she is very correct to accuse Katherine of negligent misrepresentation, and thus should hold Katherine liable for the leaky roof problem.
Answer: The Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99)
Explanation:
The Montreal Convention of 1999 (MC99) unified all different international treaties that were in force with regards to Airline liability since 1929.
Designed as a single, universal treaty meant to govern airline liability across the globe, it established airline liability in the case of death or injury to passengers, as well as in cases of delay, damage or loss of baggage and cargo.
The United States of America RATIFIED the Agreement on the 5th of September 2003 after it passed the Senate in July of the same year. It then came into effect 60 days later on the 4th of November 2003.
