I want to see people’s opinion on this.

English

1 answer:

Tasya [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: I would actually disagree on this

Explanation: In America there was a time period where conscientious objectors were ordered by the government to vote. However, their denial to vote brought them severe prison time, torture and opposition. If 16 year olds could vote then people with religious beliefs or who are conscientious objectors would be bullied by political peers and such pressure could obligate them to go against their conscious and norms. From ages 16 to 18 a person is too young to commit the right decisions without a person actually influencing them. A person is capable of thinking for themselves without outward influences when they are about 21 and up. Also, voting is not necessary, it’s simple tradition. It’s a superficial thing, people think they choose the president but in reality it’s the Supreme Court who makes that decision for you. You could fact check that if you attend a civics class or if you directly ask a representative from congress.

You might be interested in

Rip Van Winkle, however, was one of those happy mortals, of foolish, well-oiled dispositions, who take the world easy, eat white

dexar [7]

The answer would be he is inventive or lazy

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following writers was not considered a transcendent

Alla [95]

I think the answer would be the spelling of Emily Dickenson is wrong. So she is the answer. However, Emerson's transcendentalism influenced the work of writers Henry David Thoreau, Walt Whitman, and Emily Dickinson. The transcendentalists championed individualism.

4 0

2 years ago

..................................................................................

ValentinkaMS [17]

$\: \: \: \: \: \:$

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As a student of critical thinking, you are at a conference and you hear one of the panellists utter the statement that "a cellul

eduard

The way I would explain to the speaker the meaning of his statement is that I would tell him that the meaning is connotative and not literal.

<h3>The alternative definition I would tell him</h3>

I would tell him that instead of describing a cellular phone as one that is cellular, it is better to call it a smartphone.

Hence. we can see that by referring to the phone as a smartphone, it does not have one meaning, and removes confusion, and then you would have to explain the uses of a smartphone.

Read more about connotative meanings here:

brainly.com/question/711021

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

You want to go out for Chinese, but your significant other wants Italian. You say, "OK. Let's go for Italian." You are demonstra

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is that this is a demonstration of compromised.

Explanation:

This is a way of resolving conflcit many people used. This is compromising because she decides its better to agree with the significant others than have a disagreement.

3 0

2 years ago