Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
Answer:
I believe it would be a lot easier to argue organization's ethical responsibility to help employees deal with stress.
<u>Here's some ideas:</u>
<em>INTRO</em>
--> Introduce your topic/argument
(make sure to include a thesis statement!!)
First, show the reader how damaging stress can be to the employee by explaining it's negative impact on the employee's wellbeing:
- Symptoms of stress and ways that it negatively impacts employees specifically.
- Mention how stress reduces productivity and site research about it.
Point out how common stress is within the workplace by using stats or current day examples:
- Statistics about the huge percentage of people who report feeling stressed out from work.
- Use the current day example of how the current pandemic has had a massive impact on the stress especially on healthcare workers.
- Main point: <em>stress is a very common and serious problem among employees</em>.
<em>BODY</em>
Argue how organizations DO have an ethical responsibility to help employees deal with stress:
- Point out how it's a very serious problem.
- Argue that an organization who chooses not to help is a bad organization.
- Show examples in history where organizations did not take good care of their employees.
To further strengthen your argument, mention how beneficial it is for the organization itself to provide resources for employees to help them manage their stress:
- Provide statistics on the usefulness of stress-management programs within the workplaces (example: INCREASES PRODUCTION).
- Argue how happier employees also tend to function better in the workplace because they feel supported.
<em>CONCLUSION</em>
--> Summarize your essay
- Summarize your main points and restate your thesis statement here.
Based on the question provided above, there are no choices
provided and I have found a similar question that has its choices which are;
-
Use only complex sentences
-
Correct run-on sentences
-
Correct fragments
-
Use only simple sentences
-
Reduce sentence lengths
With the given choices, the correct answers are the
following;
-
Correct run-on sentences – run on sentences
should be corrected in order for the faulty sentences to be improved and revise
as they contain two or more main clause or independent clause in which are
being joined without any word to correct them and by this, it makes the readers
confused.
-
Correct fragments – fragments should be
corrected as these are sentences that are incomplete that makes the content of
an information to lose its value as the information is incomplete.
-
Reduce sentence lengths – it is best to reduce
sentence lengths so that the readers won’t find the reading material boring to
read at and in the same time, make it more easy and attractive to read
Answer:
(in the graph)
Explanation:
The PPF will show how Mario can only do as much of pizza and pasta and there is a certain point at which producing additional units of pasta or pizza comes at the cost of resinging a unit of the other good.
The points over the line and below the lien are attainable.
While those above the frontier are unattainable for Mario's current factor disposition.
So like makeup like does anyone know what this is made out of
It’s made out of bat poop so if you wear make up I advise you don’t
