Answer:
Irrelevant to the decision of whether to discontinue a product line because they will not differ between alternatives.
Explanation:
Unavoidable fixed costs can be defined as the costs that is sustained by an organization irrespective of if an activity is carried out or not.
Unavoidable costs are the costs that are encountered by a lot of businesses, this cost cannot be prevented even though production activities in the company are suspended in the short-run. These fixed costs are unavoidable and uncontrollable.
Unavoidable fixed costs is as a result of the various risks incurred by an organization inorder to stay relevant in the market. Example of unavoidable costs include tax payment, rental payments.
Economics conditions, political stability and balance of payments 3
Step six is to complete the plan.
The basic six steps are:
- receiving the requirements
- issuing a warning order
- making the tentative plan
- initiating the movement
- conducting the <span>reconnaissance, and finally
</span>- completing the plan
It is also advisable to follow the 6 steps by two additional steps which are:
- issuing the complete order
- supervision
Answer:
The arbitrageur should borrow money at 4% per annum since it is cheaper than paying the forward price for delivery
Explanation:
Current price of gold=$1,400 per ounce
Forward price=$1,500
The arbitrageur can either pay the forward price or borrow $1400 and pay the interest of 4% in a year. Consider option 1 paying the forward price of 1500
Option 1
Since there are no additional costs, the total cost for buying the gold=forward price=$1,500
Option 2
If the arbitrageur borrows the 1400 to pay for the gold now, then pay the interest in 1 year;
The total cost=Amount borrowed+interest accrued in 1 year
Total cost=1400+(4%×1400)
1400+((4/100)×1400)
1400+56=$1456
Since there are no additional costs, option 2=$1456
If we compare option 1 to option 2, we notice that option 2 is slightly cheaper than option 1 by $44
(Option 1-Option 2)=(1500-1456)=$44
The arbitrageur should borrow money at 4% per annum since it is cheaper than paying the forward price for delivery
<h2>Luke cannot sell the product because patent is already been issued to the similar product.</h2>
Explanation:
According to the given scenario, Luke though he is an inventor and he has created a product which is similar to already patented, Luke is not allowed to sale based on the patent rule.
Since there is a patent right obtained by someone for similar product, then what Luke is trying to do is against the Patent law.
Luke cannot prove that he already had an idea. Any law always needs a proof than a statement.
Luke may be punishable under the patent law if he tries to sell his invention.
