The correct answer is B. Reducing hours will allow people to educate themselves on economy and business so that they may improve labour inequities and depressions.
In "The Plea for Eight Hours" (1890), Powderly makes an argument in favour of the eight-hour workday. The main argument can be found near the end of the text. He argues that if manufacturers and men worked eight hours, they would have time to study the finance and how to solve the problems that apparently force them to work long hours to make profits. With better understanding of business and economy, they would be able to work less hours but with the same profitability.
Personally, the option I would choose is D. exonerated: out of, to complete the analogy. My reasoning would be that when you are carried by emotions, you are elated, the same way that when you are exonerated, you are deposed, or out of a certain service.
However, the answer that I found people saying is correct all over the Internet is C. coherent : to place, so, I don't know whom you should believe, sorry. :/
<span>Darrow uses charged language, such as “crazy” and “barbarous” and “ashamed” to persuade the judge and audience to reject the death penalty in spite of the horrible crime Leopold and Loeb committed.
These types of words would hang in the audience's minds and appeal to their emotions. Using this type of language would make the audience think and hopefully persuade them to reject the death penalty. </span>